How to Calculate Gratuity in UAE: Your Ultimate Guide to End-of-Service Benefits
16/12/2025
YOUNG AND RIGHT ACCOUNTING & TAX CONSULTANCY
From corporate tax registration to audits and bookkeeping, Young & Right offers personalized solutions that keep your business compliant and stress-free. Let’s take the complexity off your plate—starting with a free consultation.
Book Your Free Consultation
In the rapidly evolving landscape of healthcare, one of the most significant transformations is the shift from traditional fee-for-service models to value-based funding (VBC), also known as value-based health care or value-based healthcare. This change moves away from compensating healthcare providers for the volume of services rendered and instead focuses on rewarding them for delivering high-quality, cost-effective care that improves patient outcomes. As part of transforming healthcare and improving healthcare systems globally, value-based programs emphasize the implementation of value-based health care through VBHC models that prioritize health care delivery, value-based healthcare delivery, and the involvement of health care professionals. In this guide, we’ll explore the core principles of value-based funding, how it’s reshaping the healthcare system, health care system, and health system, and what it means for providers and patients alike, including better health outcomes for patients and patient health outcomes relative to costs.
Value-based funding (or value-based care) refers to healthcare payment models that incentivize providers to deliver better care at lower costs, focusing on the cost of care and value in health care. Instead of paying for each test, visit, or procedure under fee-for-service models, healthcare providers are reimbursed based on the value of care they provide. This means that providers are rewarded for improving health outcomes and reducing unnecessary costs, aligning with value-based purchasing and paying for value.
The core idea behind value-based funding is simple: improve health outcomes while controlling costs, emphasizing health outcomes and cost, measuring health outcomes, and measurement of health outcomes. When care is focused on quality—such as reducing hospital readmissions or managing chronic conditions more effectively—overall healthcare costs can be minimized, while patient outcomes are optimized. This approach supports enhanced care, care outcomes, effectiveness of care, and comprehensive care across various care settings, including for patients with cancer where patient outcomes relative to costs are critical.
Value-based care emerged as a response to rising healthcare costs, particularly in countries like the U.S., where healthcare spending constitutes nearly 18% of GDP. In the early 2000s, organizations like the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) proposed a model called the "Triple Aim," which focused on improving patient experience, enhancing population health, and reducing costs per capita, laying the groundwork for VBHC initiatives and payment reform.
In the U.S., the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) was pivotal in pushing the value-based funding agenda. Programs introduced under the Affordable Care Act (2010) set the stage for widespread adoption of value-based payment models, facilitating the volume to value transition. Globally, countries like the UK and Australia have also adopted similar models, although the U.S. has led in creating formal incentive structures that align care providers and healthcare organizations in implementing value-based health care and implementing value-based health care strategies.
To fully grasp the shift, it's essential to compare traditional fee-for-service models with value-based funding, highlighting differences in payment systems, incentives, and overall impact on health service delivery.
FFS reimburses providers based on the volume of services rendered, often leading to unnecessary treatments. VBC ties payments to patient outcomes, quality, and cost-efficiency, incentivizing providers to focus on quality care over quantity.
FFS encourages service volume, sometimes resulting in overutilization. In contrast, VBC rewards efficiency, prevention, and better outcomes, with penalties for poor performance and incentives for improved patient care.
FFS focuses on the quantity of care, while VBC prioritizes quality, patient satisfaction, and long-term health improvements, ensuring comprehensive care and addressing healthcare disparities.
FFS carries minimal risk for providers, as they are paid regardless of outcomes. VBC involves shared financial risk, with penalties for poor outcomes and rewards for cost-effective, high-quality care.
FFS offers predictable revenue but can increase costs and prioritize quantity over quality. VBC improves outcomes and reduces costs but requires significant investment and robust systems, which can be challenging for smaller practices.
🔹FFS :
🔹VBC :
Pros: Encourages preventive care, improves outcomes, and reduces costs.
Cons: Requires robust systems and significant investment, which can be challenging for smaller practices.
Several essential components contribute to the success of value-based funding models, ensuring quality improvement and effective care:
Payments are linked to standardized metrics like patient satisfaction, readmission rates, and adherence to evidence-based guidelines.
Providers share in cost savings or face penalties for exceeding cost benchmarks. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are an example of this model in action.
A fixed payment covers the entire episode of care, such as hip replacement surgery, encouraging coordination across providers to minimize complications.
Integrated care teams focus on addressing both medical and social needs to improve patient outcomes, enhancing patient care.
Electronic health records (EHRs) and data analytics tools track outcomes and identify areas for improvement, enabling providers to predict and manage high-risk patients.
Modern value-based models account for factors like socioeconomic status to ensure that care is fair and accessible to all populations.
→ For Patients:
Patients benefit from value-based funding through improved care, faster recovery, and better chronic disease management. The emphasis on preventive care reduces avoidable hospitalizations and lowers overall healthcare costs, contributing to better health outcomes and longer life expectancy.
→ For Providers:
Providers are financially incentivized to improve the quality of care. By coordinating care effectively, reducing administrative burdens, and focusing on outcomes, they can access performance bonuses and improve their bottom line.
→ For Payers and Systems:
Value-based funding can generate significant cost savings—estimates suggest up to 20% savings in medical spending—by discouraging wasteful spending and encouraging preventive care and early intervention.
→ CMS Programs:
The End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program (ESRD QIP) adjusts payments to dialysis centers based on quality metrics.
→ Private Sector Initiatives:
Insurers like Aetna have incorporated value-based contracts that reward providers for outcomes and integrated care.
→ Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI):
A CMS initiative that pays a fixed amount for procedures like joint replacements, incentivizing providers to reduce costs while maintaining quality.
Despite its many benefits, the transition to value-based funding presents challenges:
→ Measurement Complexity:
Defining and tracking "value" requires sophisticated data systems, and some outcomes are difficult to quantify.
→ Transition Costs:
Implementing value-based care models requires substantial upfront investment in technology, staff training, and system redesign.
→ Potential for Underservice:
If incentives are misaligned, there’s a risk that providers may avoid high-risk patients or skimp on necessary care to cut costs.
→ Uneven Adoption:
While primary care is adopting value-based models more readily, specialists and rural areas face obstacles due to insufficient infrastructure.
→ Equity Concerns:
Without proper safeguards, the model could exacerbate healthcare disparities if social determinants of health aren’t adequately addressed.
As healthcare transitions from traditional fee-for-service models to value-based funding, the need for effective solutions to improve care quality while managing costs becomes more critical. At Young & Right, we specialize in helping healthcare organizations navigate the complexities of this shift. Our team offers expertise in maximizing outcomes relative to the cost and ensuring that providers are well-positioned to thrive in a value-driven environment. Here's how we can assist:
Value-based funding prioritizes care delivery and care quality over volume, making it essential for healthcare providers to offer high-quality care efficiently. We guide organizations in adopting strategies that improve care outcomes while controlling costs, ensuring that they meet regulatory requirements and achieve overall health improvement.
Transitioning to value-based care often encounters resistance to change within organizations. Our team helps healthcare providers overcome this by implementing tailored strategies for staff engagement, training, and fostering a culture that embraces the shift to value-based models. We ensure that the workforce is aligned with the new goals and understands the long-term benefits.
One of the key goals of value-based funding is the drive toward universal health coverage (UHC). We support healthcare organizations in meeting these targets by aligning their care delivery models with value-based frameworks that can expand access while ensuring sustainability. Our expertise helps ensure that both quality and equity in healthcare are achieved.
At the heart of value-based funding is achieving optimal outcomes relative to the cost. We assist organizations in developing data-driven approaches that analyze clinical outcomes and financial performance to maximize the value of care provided. Our solutions help reduce wasteful spending while improving patient health outcomes.
Implementing value-based funding requires strategic planning and strong operational foundations. Young & Right offers comprehensive support from regulatory compliance to financial management, ensuring that your transition is smooth, efficient, and successful. We guide organizations in adopting systems that support cost-effective care while improving patient outcomes.
Looking ahead, value-based funding models are expected to expand as new technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and telehealth, improve data collection and care delivery. The success of value-based funding will depend on continued collaboration among stakeholders, refinement of measurement tools, and an unwavering commitment to patient-centered care.
At Young & Right, we specialize in supporting healthcare providers through this transition. Our expertise in accounting, tax consultancy, and clinical costing can guide you in optimizing financial models like value-based funding. Whether you need assistance with data integration, risk management, or compliance, we’re here to help your healthcare practice thrive in this new era of value-based care.
Partner with Young & Right to implement value-driven strategies that improve patient outcomes, optimize costs, and meet global healthcare standards.
Get Expert Support Now
